COVID-19 Pandemic Management vs Panicdemic Management
Basic Supply versus Demand Economics of ANY Pandemic
NOTE: This essay assumes that the reader has read the 2 links below which establish the following:
A) Yes, there is pain, suffering and death regarding COVID-19. Yes, some densely populated areas will have to deal with a wave of patients.
B) No, millions of humans never have been at risk of dying from COVID-19. The projections of mass death were not created with any intent except to disrupt the global economy and upend the November, 2020, general election in the United States. The projections are the “pretext” for global economic and political subversion.
C) No, there is no great crisis need to have shut down the US and global economy and strip the constitutionally guaranteed rights of 330,000,000 United States Citizens “until further notice.”
This is the perspective taken in the following essay. The perspective taken also is illustrated by the quote from the Bruce Lee movie Enter the Dragon:
“The enemy has only images and illusions behind which he hides his true motives.
Destroy the image, and you will break the enemy.”
“Pandemic” Vs. “Panicdemic”: Defining the Difference between them
Some readers will undoubtedly argue that since the author has not worked in a hospital or in medicine that the author should not be taken seriously. Of course, these arguments are made by the same people who do work in the medical industry and either didn’t know or didn’t care that the “Gold Standard” studies W.H.O. and the CDC promoted stating that 2,200,000 Americans could “die in a few months” were completely fraudulent.
Face facts: The Leadership of WHO and the CDC and pretty well every medical organization group should be terminated for fraud. They sent the world into fear and crashed Capitalism and have locked down billions of humans based upon FRAUD!
This is the illusion. It is an illusion that those who are politicians in power and in positions of medical power actually know what they are talking about when they state “millions will die” or that we need to “flatten the curve.” It is also the same illusion they will use to publicly congratulate each other because “millions didn’t die” even though millions were never at risk!
The Leadership of WHO and the CDC and the politicians have repeated the phrase “flatten the curve” to justify their actions. The “curve” they talk about “flattening” is a curve based upon a FRAUDULENT MODEL! THERE NEVER WAS CURVE TO FLATTEN! COVID-19 IS A VIRUS. IT DOESN’T KNOW STATE OR NATIONAL BORDERS! ONCE PUBLIC THE VIRUS CANNOT BE STOPPED!
Obviously The Author believes almost NOTHING anyone standing behind a COVID-19 microphone says. Obviously the author suggests the reader take the same approach because the people behind the microphones are the ones who used Fraudulent projections to:
1) Take away your constitutional rights including the right to earn an income.
2) Take away your Constitutional Right To Assemble as well as the right to Freedom of Religion
3) Freed criminals from prison while jailing and fining those who do Assemble
4) Passed a $2+ Trillion “bailout bill” which…coupled with the loss of at least $1+ Trillion in tax revenue SIGNIFICANTLY Increase the overall US Federal Debt of $23.4 Trillion by 15% or more!
The simple fact of the matter is that the global leadership have no clearly defined definition of when a pandemic justifies shutting down basically all human lives on planet earth. This is why they were able to use the COVID-19 outbreak as a pretext for what morally constitutes criminal activity.
The following definition clearly states a justifiable method for defining when any viral outbreak can be used for shutting down the economy. Such a definition is required to avoid a repeat of what occurred with COVID-19:
The Definition of a Pandemic that justifies the shutting down of as much human interaction with each other as well as the vast majority of global economic activity is when over a sustained 30 day period there is a daily 20% + rate increase in deaths of healthy humans compared to the expected historical death rate for the pandemic hot spot.
In English what this says is:
1) A viral infection has flared up somewhere on earth
2) There is an expected daily death rate for the region where the viral infection has flared up.
3) For 30 days solid the viral infection is killing healthy humans at a rate 20%+ greater than what healthy humans in the flare up region normally die at.
Using this definition the humans on planet Earth would still have experienced COVID-19 but the global economic shutdown would NOT have occurred. In the USA there would not have been a “sudden” $2+ Trillion dollar spending bill rushed through Congress. Citizen’s Constitutional rights would not have been trampled.
Using this definition FRAUDULENT “scientific models” stating that millions of humans will die without drastic measures without any justification supported by existing data cannot be used. Those claiming that a “pandemic” that requires global shutdown are forced to actually prove that they aren’t just creating a “panicdemic.”
What occurred with COVID-19 is that the Global Leadership created a global “pandemic panic “…or “panicdemic”…based upon the fact that humans with compromised health systems were dying at an accelerated rate when regular healthy humans were not dying at an excess rate over normal. The death rate for those with compromised health systems was applied globally against humans.
“Pandemic Management” Vs. “Panicdemic Management”
Management can mean one of two things:
1) The situation is managed
2) One manages to get by
In the military the general is a manager. Some generals are great managers. They manage the situation.
Some generals are not great managers. Those that are not great managers usually lose their jobs in time of crisis because they fail because they only manage to get by and casualties among the troops are significant and the battles are lost.
The linked article below is from March 29, 2020. It is a scare headline noting that Fauci (head of COVID-19 US response team) warns that 200,000 Americans may die “in a few months.” The article actually states a number of between 100,000 to 200,000 dead.
What the article doesn’t tell you is that 11 days prior on March 18, 2020, that Fauci was basing the US Response on projections of 2,200,000 Americans possibly dead “in a few months.” The article doesn’t tell the reader that Fauci was only off by MILLIONS dead and millions more hospitalized only 11 days prior! That kind of gets swept under the rug…along with restoring the rights of globally that were taken away by the FRAUDULENT projections.
The article also doesn’t tell you that this author on March 18, 2020, read the projection of 2,200,000 “dead in a few months”…went to the John Hopkins COVID-19 tracking site…did some really basic math and used Common Sense…and knew within minutes that the projections were FRAUDULENT. If the author could do this then the people in charge of the “panicdemic” response should have immediately known the projections were absurdly unrealistic.
https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/us/us-virus-deaths-could-reach-200000-fauci-warns-as-medical-supplies-run-short/ar-BB11S5uv?ocid=spartanntp&fbclid=IwAR1rH4IEF2tHFVpKg8Z8Vj47EZyK2XICwGga_k7F8ZaNF7Zv8uE9Z6w4BTk
This Independent regards the current COVID-19 situation to an issue of management on multiple levels. The levels are medical, media and political in nature because, as already documented, what is occurring globally is not about COVID-19. COVID-19 is the pretext to destroying the global economy and interfering with the November, 2020, United States general election.
The issue is that what should have been a “management of pandemic” was actually “management of panicdemic.” The issue is that the viral response created an unnecessary global panic which has nothing to do with actually managing the viral outbreak.
The first level to review is the management of the Medical response. Subsequent documents will address the media and political levels as well as tying the levels to the principles of The Byzantine Pineapple.
General Management of the Pandemic\Panicdemic Medical Situation
It is obvious to the author that the pandemic preparation planning done in the past in the United States was lacking in putting together a realistic plan for addressing a pandemic. It will be made clear that key misjudgments were made by the planners. This is not intended to be overly critical of the planning done in the lead-up to COVID-19. Humans learn from mistakes made by humans and the author can see how the following missteps regarding planning could have been made.
Everything starts with defining what a “pandemic” really is. The author defines “pandemic” as a “global outbreak of a disease.” Using that as a basis then there really are a limited number of methods that a pandemic can occur:
1) Low rate transmission such as occurred with HIV.
2) High rate transmission such as occurred with H1N1 and COVID-19 and the standard influenza.
Low rate transmission diseases pose a lesser immediate threat in the respect that there is more time to react before a significant human population is infected. High rate transmission diseases pose a greater immediate threat in the respect that as soon as they start to exist the diseases are global before this recognition of the disease. As explained in the March 25 essay within 30 days of Patient Zero the probability is that so many humans have come into contact with those infected that the “genie is out of the bottle.”
In either case the following factors always remain constant:
A) The earliest cases of the transmission are either doomed or have a natural body defense system that allows them to survive.
B) The medical staff’s treating the earliest patients has an occupational hazard which exposes them to the new outbreak and therefore the medical staff is at high risk for contraction.
The failures many people have grasping these concepts are that many people don’t view the medical as a manufacturing industry. The fact is that hospital, morgues, and medical treatment facilities all are little more than factories processing human beings in and out.
This leads to the following conclusions:
i) There is a finite number of ways that a pandemic can spread fast. It is either spread by air or by touch or by both.
ii) Since the “genie is out of the bottle” within 30 days then the infection will spread everywhere with dense population centers being hit the worst. It is impossible to stop the outbreak.
There are also other conclusions that can be drawn:
a) Within a relatively short period of time (meaning a week minimum and a month maximum) the disease causing the transmission will be diagnosed with modern medical technology.
b) Within a relatively short period of time starting in select dense population areas but subsequently in ALL dense and sparser population areas the demand for existing medical resources is going to accelerate beyond the supply of existing medical resources at a moment in time. The system will bog down until the supply catches up with the demand. Until that point in time there will be an unavoidably high level of pain, suffering and death by both patients and front-line medical staff.
This is the one major area of what the central pandemic crisis control center should be focused on and planning for: Initial and continuous updating of Supply vs Demand. Based upon events unfolding it appears that some planning for the demand exceeding supply has worked and other areas the planning has been lacking. Regardless, the fear spread by the government is total mismanagement of the basics of the supply versus demand issue. The fear government spread was a fear based upon completely unrealistic\fraudulent Demand for medical supplies and services. The fear spread by the government created Panicdemic on top of a pandemic.
Pandemics occur annually on Planet Earth. There is never any reason to panic just because the word pandemic is used. There is also no reason that a panicdemic needs to be created on top of a pandemic unless significant quantities of healthy humans are suddenly dying in numbers that exceed the normal death rate. There was no need for the global governments to create a Panicdemic from the COVID-19 pandemic. It has all been a global lie!
Lessons from History about Casualties and First Responders
Some readers may consider some of the above comments as being callous. This section is to address that thinking before picking back up on the supply versus demand issue.
1) D-Day landing
On D-Day the Generals in command of the Allied troops suffered over 10,000 casualties. Those troops were akin to the front-line hospital personnel. A General somewhere is sending the troops to potential death or injury. A job in the military means that being a casualty is an occupational hazard. In any battle some die to win the war.
In a certain sense those D-Day casualties were a form of “First Responders.” They were the first wave of the liberation of Europe. They went in knowing there was a high probability of being a casualty. Some survived, some were physically injured, some were mentally injured, and some died.
2) Nagasaki and Hirsoshima atomic bombing
The Allied Generals had a choice: either send thousands more Allied troops to become causalities of a land invasion of Japan, or explode the atomic bombs over Japan. The choice made was to explode the bombs over Nagasaki and Hiroshma.
200,000 people are estimated to be dead and injured due to the bombings. After the bombs exploded the Japanese people left alive and capable of helping undoubtedly ran in and tried to do what they could. They had no radiation suits. They had few if any supplies to help thousands of blast patients. Those who helped most likely either died or destroyed their bodies systems because they went into a radiation blast zone and caused long term irreparable damage.
Those who went in and assisted in Nagasaki and Hiroshima were First Responders. They went to their deaths with few supplies but they went in nonetheless.
3) The 9/11 First responders
Those who ran into the burning buildings didn’t have time to get masks. The buildings were ablaze and they needed to get people out and to safety as fast as possible. After the buildings collapsed they had to go back in and they willingly filled their lungs with noxious materials to try and save others.
Those who immediately went in on 9\11 were First Responders. They became casualties as well.
In all 3 cases the world survived and moved forward while those First Responders suffered. Being a First Responder (which is what medical “front-line personnel are) means that the First Responder has an occupational hazard of being a casualty. It goes with the territory.
Heroes aren’t pop stars who sing about their sexual and recreational drug exploits or how much money they have. First Responders are true heroes. The First Responders could choose not to address the immediate challenge because it could mean their death or short\long term disability. The First Responders choose to sacrifice their well-being for the well-being of others.
Planning a Pandemic Response vs Planning a Panicdemic Response
Planning resources with modern technology really shouldn’t be that hard. There are plenty of tools available. However, it still requires a brain to actually think through the data. The applicable phrase is Garbage in, Garbage Out.
If the projections are that multiple millions will die globally “in a few months” when not even a million will die “in a few months” then the pandemic response is “Garbage In, Garbage out.” This is what the COVID-19 response was: “Garbage In, Garbage out.” This is not “pandemic planning” it is “panicdemic planning!”
The planning groups seem to be a combination of WHO, the CDC, a special government task force, each state task force, and each hospital system. This also extends to other countries as well because a virus doesn’t know borders. All the systems are going to be looking for the same initial and long term resources.
Planning starts with initial estimates and timelines. In times of crisis these estimates and timelines should be updated at least once a day. This is especially true in the case of any pandemic because a virus doesn’t know the time differences between countries.
It’s pretty clear from the evidence that any person involved with central planning the COVID-19 was incompetent. They based everything upon fraudulent projections, and then never figured out that the projections were off by a magnitude of approximately 100 for at least 10 days if not longer. The CYA they will give is that “it was just an honest mistake using the best information at the time.”
What a load of fecal matter statements like that are. From the very moment the author saw the projections and did less than 5 minutes of research on the Johns Hopkins website the author knew the projections were fraudulent. The people involved with coordinating the pandemic response didn’t exercise the Common Sense to realize either immediately or over at least a 10 day period that the projections were fraudulent. The pandemic\panicdemic response leadership is responsible for:
1) Shutting down global economic activity
2) Putting 3 billion people under house arrest
3) Causing unnecessary debt to be heaped upon at least the citizens of the United States as well as probably the citizens of pretty well every other country on planet earth.
4) Disrupting the lives and economic well beings of pretty well every human on planet earth.
The pandemic response leadership should be fired and brought to trial for fraud.
This leads to the biggest issue of all. What right does ANY government have to suspend mass civil liberties under the guise of “pandemic?” The only definition seems to be “we the government believe potential mass death give the government the right to suspend Constitutionally guaranteed rights” without having to provide solid evidence to justify the actions. THIS MUST CHANGE OR THE SAME THING WILL HAPPEN AGAIN.
Look at what happened in 2020 with COVID-19. Fraudulent projections of mass death have been used to shut down economic activity and to lock up people in their own houses. When the projections have been proven to be fraudulent the Civil Rights have NOT been immediately returned. And if the reader doesn’t consider falsely claiming millions of lives are at stake as fraudulent when there never was a shred of evidence that the millions of lives were at stake the question then is: Just what does constitute fraud in your mind?
From a medical perspective there really are a finite number of resources that will be necessary in terms of a pandemic that spreads fast. The only way that a pandemic can spread so fast is either by touch or by air or by both. Realistically only an influenza style virus that can be spread by air, touch, or both can spread so rapidly to cause a pandemic. That means that there really are only a finite number of resources that must be planned and coordinated for a pandemic.
1) Masks, gloves, gowns and similar face\body covering devices
2) Respiration devices
3) Whatever drugs are standard for working to combat influenza style viruses.
4) Hospitalization rooms\Materials to set up isolation units rapidly
5) Morgues\body handing supplies for morgues
6) Staffing to handle all of the above.
For all the whining in the media there really is a finite list of items that are required initially in terms of planning. The list is no different than what is ordered naturally through a purchasing department of any of these facilities.
All of these items have standard lead times that normally are not too long a lead time. Most of these items have multiple ways they can be manufactured. The issues therefore are:
A) Are the resources currently available being planned properly?
B) What central command takes charge of managing the expected bottleneck in current production with respect to global needs?
Are the resources currently available being planned properly?
With respect to COVID-19 the answer is obviously NO! All resource supply\demand planning has to start with REALISTIC projections about the impact of the pandemic.
As has been demonstrated in other articles already the projections were fraudulent. The projections were NOT based upon any “scientific modeling.” The projections appear to have been influenced by a “geopolitical agenda.” The projections were off by a factor of at least 100 if not greater! Not only that it took at least 10 days for recognition that the factors despite were so significantly off!
Not only that the second wave of projections of 100,000 to 200,000 “dead in a few months” in the USA were also fraudulent. On March 30, 2020, nearly 5 months since patient zero, the global death toll on the John Hopkins website for deaths attributed to COVID-19 are 34,686. The average global daily death rate is holding steady at about 3,000 deaths attributed to COVID-19 daily. Use some Common Sense! There is zero reason to believe the fraudulent projections of 100,000 to 200,000 “dead in a few months” in the USA when in 5 months the global total is 34,686. The virus is not going to suddenly become deadlier!
This again calls into question the make-up and organization of any existing pandemic management group. If anything occurs there should be an official inquiry into how such a gross\obscene mistake could be allowed to perpetuate for so long when the author…Although not being involved in the process and armed only with the John Hopkins website data…immediately knew and documented for people to see that the projections were obviously fraudulent. CAUSING A GLOBAL ECONOMIC SHUTDOWN\LOCKDOWN USING FRAUDULENT PANDEMIC PROJECTIONS OVERSTATING THE PANDEMIC BY A FACTOR OF AT LEAST 100 IS CRIMINAL!
From a global perspective the projections can initially be built and updated daily as to what the expected demand in each region around the globe will be. Common Sense states that some location is where the early patients live and that the virus will spread from there via personal, auto, rail, and airplane traffic.
Common Sense also dictates that if mass quantities of healthy humans in the initial affected regions are NOT dying from the cause of the pandemic then globally mass quantities of healthy humans will NOT die from the pandemic. As already noted in the other essays the death rate in Hubei did not significantly increase over the existing death rate in Hubei. Since the death rate in Hubei did not statistically increase there was no reason to panic all humans with obscenely fraudulent models of “millions dead in a few months.”
From the point of recognition that some form of pandemic is occurring that requires global coordination everything becomes a matter of management of resources. This means initial planning with a standard daily update as new information comes available.
Much angst can be found in biased news stories and political speeches that either the political right or the political left is responsible for a shortage of resources by not having enough emergency stocks on hand of supplies. Much angst can be found in biased news stories and political speeches that either the political right or the political left is responsible for a shortage of resources due to manufacturing being in a foreign country (generally China is listed as to blame). The fact is that these stories are pretty much hyperbole that should be dismissed as propaganda pieces.
With respect to supplies there have been plenty of press articles stating that people should panic or be upset because there are neither enough masks nor enough respirators to go around. At the beginning of a pandemic there are never enough supplies to go around. This is just basic economics. It doesn’t make economic sense to stock warehouses perpetually waiting for every possible event that may occur.
The failure of not enough masks available falls squarely with the Global Pandemic Management Response Teams (GPMRT). The GPMRT acted like there were an infinite number of masks available. By urging the medical staffs as well as the public globally to buy and to continue changing masks multiple times a day the GPMRT started a panic usage which caused a shortage. When the GPMRT tell every medical staff which (includes all ambulance drivers and others not directly inside a hospital) around the globe to change masks and destroy the used mask with every single patient they meet then obviously the sudden surge in usage is going to cause a shortage.
As the initial panic surge caused by the GPMRT starts then the purchasing departments place orders. The orders exceed current production that is planned. Demand outweighs supply. How does the manufacturing company \ distribution company decide which orders get satisfied first?
This situation explains the fallacy of the angst over goods being produced in a foreign country. The goods that are now low in supply but high in demand that are made in China are not only needed by the USA but by China and by other countries around the globe. If the orders could immediately be met and the money made then whether it is Chinese people or people in other countries they would be happy to make money off of the deal. Production can’t be ramped up that fast. First Responders are at risk.
The author experienced this firsthand while living on Grand Bahama Island and Grand Cayman Islands after the devastation from hurricanes Frances, Ivan and Jeanne. Not only were the islands devastated so too were multiple states in the USA. Who do you think got the resources first…the foreign islands or the States? Of course the States did! Not because of any spite or malice but because there were only so many building and other supplies available to meet a sudden surge in demand.
This is where the beauty of capitalism shows itself. When the demand surges other product sources become available. The market shifts. Suddenly in the USA all sorts of manufacturing sources for masks have sprung up seemingly overnight. Undoubtedly something similar is occurring in other countries. Capitalism works.
One question is whether the GPMRT are coordinating with buyers and suppliers to make sure that the supplies are logically distributed to the hot spot areas that are showing the latest flare-ups. As has been shown in the USA government anti-price gouging regulation has proven to also be beneficial. So, this is not anti-government screed. There is good that can come from government interaction. Locking down billions of people and stripping away their rights is NOT good government intervention.
The same thing is true for medicines required. The medicines may be produced in China and shipped abroad and the excess demand causes issues with supply. But the USA has thousands of laboratories across the country and undoubtedly the formulas and specifications for production. Give capitalism some time and there will be quite a lot of medicines produced to catch supply up with demand.
Respirators are similar in context. Respirators cost hospitals anywhere from $30,000 to $50,000 per unit and that doesn’t include shipping, set-up and maintenance contracts. Prior to the pandemic event there must have been enough respirators on-hand in hospitals because unless the hospital is poorly run they would already have orders placed for respirator if they needed the capital equipment. Suddenly demand exceeds supply and the complex machines almost overnight go into a backlog situation and some group needs to be coordinating the use of these resources. This is what the various GRMRT should be coordinating.
Regardless, capitalism has shown to be a benefit again. Stories exist of some respirators being modified to handle 2 patients instead of one. Unique new units are being produced by a variety of manufacturers to match supply with demand. It won’t happen overnight and some patients will unfortunately suffer. Well, the soldiers on D-Day and the Japanese people who aided Nagasaki\Hiroshima victims and the 9\11 First Responders all suffered.
The same is true for hospitalization rooms or morgues that fill up. Let capitalism work and rooms that can be fitted for hospitalization will be created. Storage space for dead bodies will also be created if necessary. Capitalism will work and government regulation can be used to oversee to prevent price gouging.
Lastly, with staffing, capitalism will work if allowed to work. History has shown that people will take the risk of illness\death to come to the aid of others. As front line bodies fall…like they did on D-Day…more bodies will appear to fill the void. They may get a crash course in “on-the-job training” but it isn’t like that hasn’t happened before in human history.
Conclusion
To recap the points made:
1) A new definition clearly defining when a “pandemic” claim can be used to cause global chaos is needed. The proposed definition is that there must be 30 days on an accelerated death rate for healthy humans for a “pandemic hot zone” to be used to justify causing such global chaos.
2) By using FRAUDULENT Projections the global governments created an unnecessary “Panicdemic.”
3) If realistic projections are used then natural economics and the laws of “Supply vs Demand” will solve any issues arising from a “pandemic.”
It really is that simple. What happened regarding COVID-19 was an unnecessary geo-political FRAUD that damaged the lives of pretty well every one of the nearly 8 billion humans on Planet Earth. The leaders of the geo-political fraud should be fired and held accountable for their actions!